Bluemoon Legends
Hi there fellow Football lover! Welcome to 606 Bluemoon Legends Forum. Have a good time and any problems, let me know.

Kindest regards
Who is online?
In total there are 9 users online :: 3 Registered, 0 Hidden and 6 Guests

blueboy, shakencity, Topdawg

Most users ever online was 441 on Sun May 22, 2011 10:20 pm
Latest topics
» Ashes cricket
Today at 9:06 am by Topdawg

» Virgil van Dijk
Today at 9:06 am by Topdawg

» Independent article
Today at 8:53 am by Topdawg

» CITY vs Spuds -LIVE!!!!!
Yesterday at 8:52 pm by blueboy

» Phil Foden wins.....
Yesterday at 7:57 pm by blueboy

» Leicester away
Yesterday at 7:16 pm by blueboy

» Park the bus song
Yesterday at 12:10 pm by Topdawg

» Kev or Jesse?
Yesterday at 12:07 pm by Topdawg

» Sunday supplement
Yesterday at 9:56 am by Topdawg

» Sterling attacked
Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:46 pm by Topdawg

December 2017

Calendar Calendar

Jamie Carragher on Aguero and Pep

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Jamie Carragher on Aguero and Pep

Post by blueboy on Sat Feb 11, 2017 9:09 am

Decisions don't come much bigger. Decisions of this kind shape fortunes of managers. Get them right and a team's potential can be unlocked. Get it wrong and the consequences are huge.
It is necessary to apply that context to the situation surrounding Sergio Aguero, Pep Guardiola and Manchester City. The best forward in the division — and one of the best players ever in the Premier League — has suddenly found himself dispensable.
It's a huge call on Guardiola's behalf. Aguero has been the emblem of this era at City, a man whose goals propelled them to two titles.
There hasn't been a better penalty-box striker in the Premier League, as his unsurpassed average of a goal every 109 minutes illustrates.
Yet here he is, no longer guaranteed to be the focal point of Guardiola's team. The buzz around Gabriel Jesus, who looks as if he will be a superstar, is understandable but how can it be that a 19-year-old whose experience of English football amounts to 278 minutes has leapt ahead of Aguero?
Well, for starters, Guardiola said last week his 'tracking back is really good'. He'd never say the same about Aguero and there is always the perception that the Argentina international is not his manager's kind of striker.
I've thought about similar situations when managers have made big calls on other goal-scoring sensations, such as when Kevin Keegan stood on the steps of St James' Park in January 1995 to explain to fans why he'd sold Andy Cole to Manchester United.
Keegan waited a few months but eventually bought Les Ferdinand to replace Cole. Ferdinand was outstanding, he became the PFA Player of the Year and Newcastle, really, should have become champions.
The best example, perhaps, revolves around Sir Alex Ferguson and Ruud van Nistelrooy in 2006 when the Holland striker was off-loaded to Real Madrid without Ferguson flinching.
At the time, I couldn't believe what Ferguson had done.
United hadn't been champions for three years and it looked to be a deal that could haunt him as Van Nistelrooy had scored 70 goals in that period and his back-up striker, Louis Saha, was not in the same class. What happened next vindicated the decision.
Not only did United win the title for the next three seasons, they also added the Champions League in 2008. Significantly, it also allowed the young talents, Cristiano Ronaldo and Wayne Rooney, to step forward. Does Guardiola have this in mind for his own young guns Jesus, Leroy Sane and Raheem Sterling?
What made Ferguson so special was not just his ability to make big decisions, but also the fact he invariably made the right ones.
Managers can make themselves look strong by selling or dropping players, but if the move doesn't work, the choice looks flawed.
Take Nicolas Anelka and Liverpool in 2002 after he'd had a brilliant loan spell. The clamour to make the deal permanent was huge but Gerard Houllier had reservations and signed El Hadji Diouf instead. We had finished runners-up to Arsenal in 2002; 12 months later we dropped to fifth.
We aren't yet at the stage where Aguero is on his way out of City.
There is even the possibility he could be restored to the starting line-up for Monday's trip to Bournemouth, given how Guardiola has tinkered with his team.
But you can't help feel it is pointing that way, and the famous spine that won five trophies is being phased out.
Claudio Bravo has taken over from Joe Hart, John Stones is the future in defence ahead of Vincent Kompany, and Yaya Toure's time in Manchester will soon be over.
There will be no public admission from Guardiola that Aguero is heading the same way and both are being diplomatic when speaking, with Aguero insisting he is happy that his contract runs for another three years.
But I can see a parallel with Aguero and Jesus for how it was for Robbie Fowler when Michael Owen emerged at Liverpool in the late 1990s. You knew when Michael came through that there would be an impact.
Once Houllier brought Emile Heskey in and Michael had won the Ballon d'Or in 2001, the writing was on the wall for Robbie and he moved to Leeds. The point is, Michael and Robbie never looked like a partnership; nor do Aguero and Jesus.
Guardiola, remember, never played with a front two at Barcelona and only did it very rarely during his time at Bayern Munich, so I cannot see him going down that route in Manchester.
Besides, how would you accommodate them? To do so, he would have to alter his system.
Jesus could play on the left but his most productive time in Brazil with Palmeiras was in a central area.
Sterling and Sane have thrived on the flanks, while Kevin De Bruyne and David Silva have sparkled playing as 'false eights', the position just in front of midfield and behind the strikers.
I said at this time last year that of all the players Guardiola would inherit, Silva and Aguero had questions to answer as you would not associate them with the high-pressing, high-intensity style their manager favours.
Silva, though, has reinvented himself in midfield. Aguero's goals-to-games ratio has been good, scoring 18 times in 26 matches, but he hasn't hit the target in any of the fixtures against sides around them in the table and one of Guardiola's complaints has been about City being 'not good enough in the boxes'.
Even so, it would still be a huge call to cut ties with Aguero.
Perhaps City have looked at what happened in Italy last summer, when Napoli sold Gonzalo Higuain for £75million to Juventus. He was 28 when that deal was completed, the same age as Aguero.
Maybe they would cash in and turn their attentions to buying the 27-year-old Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang from Borussia Dortmund; it's obvious Guardiola wants a hard-running player to fit into his system.
Yet, just say Aguero goes and City don't progress? What happens if they don't win the Premier League next year or they don't make it deep into the Champions League and Aguero is scoring elsewhere? One thing happens: the spotlight shines even more intensely on Guardiola.
He's already made one big call, and replacing Hart with Bravo hasn't worked. If his next big call is to sanction the departure of Aguero, Guardiola must have the right solution.
If he doesn't, he will have to brace himself. The only thing to follow will be serious flak.

"How you gonna live your dash?"
Thrills Mod

Posts : 23090

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum