Red TWERP's

Championing a possible career ending tackle,,
http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-Features/Football-News/2017/Nov/Man-of-the-Match-Victor-Lindelof-kickstarts-his-Manchester-United-career.aspx

and one where they wouldn't put the ball out,  refused to then give it back (getting Brighton player booked in the process) and then went on to get a totally unfair corner a minute or so later, where a huuuge deflection scores a goal...  over the head of a player just kicked 2 times by Lukaku that should have been a foul and yellow in iteslf...



and some red git has the audacity to message me and say it took fluke for us today...

and in my defence, a red friend would not accept the challenge until I could provide a video, and since this was missed from match of the day I had to google search for it..

*red acquaintance*...

Moonchester wrote:*red acquaintance*...

Theres your problem right there

Looks like the FA will look at the Lukaku challenge today...if evidence deems it worthy, he'll get a 3 match ban.

I doubt they will review this tackle though..
which is good, I'd rather they played Lindeloff against us, he makes Mangala look organised..

Just seen it....if he doesn't get a 3 match ban for that, then they are bent. He kicked him twice ffs!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-5119211/Man-United-news-Lukaku-miss-Manchester-derby-ban.html

Graham Poll:

Manchester United striker Romelu Lukaku must face a three-match ban once the FA view replays of the incident between the Belgian and Brighton’s Gaetan Bong just before the only goal of the game.
The incident started with the usual jostling between players at a corner but turned into a much more serious clash.
Lukaku was impeded as the corner came in but his reaction was extreme, kicking out first with his right foot and then making full contact with his left foot somewhere quite painful. It was a violent act which would have resulted in a red card had referee Neil Swarbrick seen it. The Brighton full back did remarkably well to not react, nor complain to the officials. He deserves praise for that.
Later in the second half, Swarbrick did see the challenge by Shane Duffy on Zlatan Ibrahimovic but failed to punish it correctly.
Duffy flew into a tackle in the 87th minute with studs first and at pace, wiping out the Swede, who could have been seriously injured.
It was also a red-card offence but, as Swarbrick punished it with a yellow card at the time, the FA cannot act.
United manager Jose Mourinho will be understandably irritated if Lukaku is banned retrospectively after Duffy escaped, but he should take comfort in the three points because the only goal of the game — Ashley Young’s deflected effort — came just after the whistle should have blown for Lukaku’s assault.

And they looked at something similar from him in a previous game too, so no excuses this time.

I thought he meant the stamp on Lovrens face against Liverpool, but they let him off as there was no way to prove intent..
if he dodges this one also (especially now it's been highlighted) then questions need asking of the process..

Think I'd rather have Lukaku playing against us as he is more likely to remain anonymous than the big nosed one

Oh what a surprise

Romelu Lukaku: No action against Man Utd striker for alleged kick on Brighton's Gaetan Bong - http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42135484

Well I'm with TMg I'd rather have a striker who has scored just once in his last 10 games playing in the derby. Still annoys me that the FA are so obviously bent though.

Someone that gets a ban from the FA should sue them for loss of earnings. They set the precedent and they should be made to pay.

Just read on Twitter, that when question as to why MOTD didn't even show the 2 kick outs by Lukaku, Lineker replied "we have to watch 5 matches, so didn't see it".....what a cnut!

Only 3 people watching the matches???

Surely they must have mentioned it in MotD 2???

nope, they missed the Lindeloff tackle completely too...