PL Kit Quiz

Name the kit supplier to each club...I'll start with the obvious and no cheating (it should be straightforward unless you want to guess Dawg :

Arsenal
Aston Villa
Burnley
Chelsea
Crystal Palace
Everton
Hull City
Leicester City
Liverpool
Manchester City - Nike
Manchester United - Nike
Newcastle United
Queens Park Rangers
Southampton
Stoke City
Sunderland
Swansea City
Tottenham Hotspur
West Bromwich Albion
West Ham United

I thought the rags were on the Adidas kit from this season?

Arsenal - Nike
Chelsea, West Brom, Swansea - Adidas
Liverpool - Warrior
Burnley - Puma
Everton, Leicester - Umbro

I think Villa's are made by Macron

Newcastle are either Umbro or Puma, but I can't remember...

Arse-puma

liverpool - warrior

villa - macron

hull - umbro

spuds - under armour

palace - macron

bugger, sorry Leo didn't see your entries

newky are puma

That's okay mate, you've said a load that I haven't.

Oh, just thought of another...  QPR are Nike too.

are sunderland adidas or nike?

I think they're Adidas, mate.  I was thinking Adidas or Puma, myself.

Watch them be Nike now

west ham - nike, umbro, adidas or puma

Topdawg wrote:west ham - nike, umbro, adidas or puma

Primark.

Who've we not done yet?  Southampton.  Theirs is Nike / Umbro / Puma / Adidas / Macron / Warrior / Armor / Hummel / Reebok / FatFace / George / TK Maxx / Some off the peg crap from Sports Direct / None of the above

All you had to do was add the manufacturers next to each...and have a 'Dawg' guess.

Which is the best looking kits?

1st -

2nd - 

3rd - 

Which are the worst looking kits?

1st - 

2nd - 

3rd -

For me:

Which is the best looking kits?

1st - City

2nd - Newcastle

3rd - Arsenal

Which are the worst looking kits?

1st - Leicester

2nd - Chelsea

3rd - Villa

Hold on...  Southampton's kit doesn't have a manufacturer logo.  Does that mean it doesn't exist??

Which are the best looking kits?

1st - City. Even though I'm not a fan of the dark collar and cuffs, it's the classiest by a mile

2nd - Arsenal.  Again, classy rather than fancy, I think Puma have done a nice job on it.

3rd - Hull.  I like the way the sponsor logo doesn't dominate the shirt.

Honourable mention for Everton, another classy shirt, but marked down because button down collars have no place on a football shirt.  Also Newcastle, their kit looks very tidy, but that solid black block in the top third is a bit jarring for me.

Which are the worst looking kits?

1st - As much as I want it to be the rag kit, it's Leicester's. It's like Puma had spent all their efforts on Arsenal and Newcastle, then completely forgot about Leicester until after the designers went home.  The colour is awful, it looks baggy and it's got the most awful button down collar ever.

2nd - Chelsea.  Those variable thickness black lines are horrid.  It looks like Reebok were subcontracted to the job.

3rd - Swansea.  For the same reason I like Hull's shirt, I dislike the Swan's sponsor logo, it's way too big and gaudy, especially against the very minimalist styling of the rest of the shirt.

Dishonourable mention for QPR.  It looks cheap.

Leo........the Gok Wan of kit descriptions.

Southampton's used to be Adidas...but this season they have designed and produced it themselves....

http://www.footyheadlines.com/2014/07/southampton-14-15-home-kit-released.html

blueboy wrote:Leo........the Gok Wan of kit descriptions.

That's my other day job!