City's new kit....nice.

They might want to separate the legs, might be a bit hard to run with them stitched together like that.

Why does Kev look like a Neanderthal?

looks like he's on Micah's Steroids!!!!

Not too sure about the socks looks like he's put his shinpads in the wrong way round on that last photo

Why are the socks not blue?....it doesn't look right with white ones.

How difficult is it to design a Manchester City home shirt?

It's sky blue. Then the shorts are white and the socks match either shirt or shorts.

At what point does someone come up with 'I know, we'll give the shirt navy blue sleeves...'? Come up with and get paid for - navy blue sleeves.

Do Man Utd wear red shorts every other season? Do Liverpool wear white shorts every other season? So why in the name of Zeus's butt plug do kit makers keep messing with ours?

What next? Orange & purple?

I don't care for it - especially those socks and blue shorts.

Disaster_Tskhadadze wrote:How difficult is it to design a Manchester City home shirt?

Very difficult, apparently.

The rags do switch between white and black shorts, a bit like we do with sky blue and white.  But I think the main reason for the shirt is so people keep buying the new one. Hence such wrong headed moves as button collars, navy cuffs, Laser Blue and any of the ridiculous bollocks that Reebok and Le Coq gave us.

Kappa was cool though,  :p

I've still got my kappa somewhere, think it was the last time I bought a full price shirt 

Yeah, I liked the Kappa kits. Not too much fancy nonsense on them.

You were saying leo  

What's fancy about that?  Block yellow, block black and white stripes, pretty basic and functional to me.  There's no swirls or slashes, no oddball patterns. no watermarks, no pictures of a moon or dots depicting singing, no embossed logos or any of that crap like we got with Reebok.  And no button down collars.  Plus, it's an away shirt, so we can forgive the colour choices.