What to do with Kia Jizzbum and the missing £20M?

We've seen the Tevez/Kia brinkmanship before. Each time Tevez has been brought back to the fold because he is a class player. This summer no-one in europe wanted to pay £50M for the guy and we couldn't get the assurances required from corinthians that they had the £40M for us.

Once Ned and the cock didn't get their moves in the summer, the email comes out and Cookie departs. Now that the club are a little destabilised Kia/Tevez throw this at us.

It is all engineered to try and make Bobby look bad, fuck the club/team up and get the cock his move away.

Someone will be happy to snap him up for £20M because he is still a top goalscorer and they will happily accept him being a cunt if he scores them 20 goals a season.

The thing is that if we do sell him in January for £20M, can we then chase Carlos for the missing £20M?

chelsea set the precedent when they successfully sued Adrian Mutu and received £14million from him so, unless something amicable can be agreed which suits all parties,a trip to the courts is likely.How ironic would it be for Pablo Zabaleta giving evidence against his compatriot?

i'd just love it if we did him.

sell him for £20M to inter and then immediately sue the bastard for £30, plus our hurt feelings and distress caused, and UEFA and FIFA don't allow him to play for anyone until he has paid up.

Let's see what his advisor does then.

i'm not sure suing him for £30 will do any good as we are paying him £24 per minute

I'd be happy if we got back the £25m we paid for him. We could then say that we've had Tevez at his peak and he's scored 50 odd goals in 80 odd games, let's just draw a line under this nightmare. Worse case scenario (IMO) is us loaning him out and I doubt we'd sell him to a Prem club either.

As for Kia, the club should draw up a list of approved agents and advisors and write it into the contracts of future players. Obviously that Iranian twat won't be on the list.