Who is online?
In total there are 16 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 16 Guests None
Most users ever online was 441 on Sun May 22, 2011 10:20 pm
Latest topics
Top posting users this month
skyblueoz | ||||
Wensdi | ||||
titbumwilly | ||||
shakencity | ||||
TMG | ||||
Paulpowersleftfoot | ||||
Topdawg | ||||
Nijinsky | ||||
Jwils2710 | ||||
atlblue |
Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
+5
TMG
Norfolk Blue
shakencity
Paulpowersleftfoot
BoyWithTheArabsCash
9 posters
Page 1 of 1
Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
So it seems reports are coming out of Spain that Madrid are willing to sell the Tranny for circa £150m.
Now with us being the only realistic club that would be able to afford him surely we could reduce the fee, the question is would you want him?
There's no doubting he is a great player, but would this kind of signing for a ridiculous fee, be just a bit too much in the eyes of City fans and the footballing world in general?
The good points would be he is in the top 2 players in the world and would improve us no end.It would be priceless to see United fans heads wobbling telling us he ain't that good.
The downside is the obscene fee along with his huge wages, bearing in mind FFP and the fact he seems to be an utterly horrible bastard.
So would you have him regardless, or concentrate on buying younger talent?
Now with us being the only realistic club that would be able to afford him surely we could reduce the fee, the question is would you want him?
There's no doubting he is a great player, but would this kind of signing for a ridiculous fee, be just a bit too much in the eyes of City fans and the footballing world in general?
The good points would be he is in the top 2 players in the world and would improve us no end.It would be priceless to see United fans heads wobbling telling us he ain't that good.
The downside is the obscene fee along with his huge wages, bearing in mind FFP and the fact he seems to be an utterly horrible bastard.
So would you have him regardless, or concentrate on buying younger talent?
BoyWithTheArabsCash- Regular Starter
- Posts : 1132
Location : Giggidy.
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
As much as I would enjoy watching the diving twat and love garden winking at gangsta Rio,I don't think having a prima donna would do anything for team spirit as I'm sure he would be resented by some which would lead to the usual hysterical nonsense from the media.
And he's a cunt
And he's a cunt
Paulpowersleftfoot- Key Player
- Posts : 3674
Location : Leafy cheshire
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
Morning Boy,
Personally speaking, without a friggin doubt. I'm not denying he's a nancy boy and cock rolled into one but despite this he's still one of the greatest players in the world currently playing, to have him playing for City would be absolutely fantastic. Why on earth would any seasoncard holder at the COMS (or any City fan come to think of it) would not want to see the likes of Ronaldo playing week in week out, would quite frankly baffle me.
The real question would probably be though "Would he come?".
Ok the fee's a bit excessive but all valuations when City are involved get inflated, i'm sure this £150m valuation would end up being nearer £100m. Re-coup £50m+ from the sale of Tevez (as he's going) along with a couple of other nearly men, bingo.....you've got you're fee back. Stick him on more or less the same wages as Tevez and realistically City haven't changed a lot financially.
This must be what 'Arry meant about Citys signings that'll blow your mind.
Personally speaking, without a friggin doubt. I'm not denying he's a nancy boy and cock rolled into one but despite this he's still one of the greatest players in the world currently playing, to have him playing for City would be absolutely fantastic. Why on earth would any seasoncard holder at the COMS (or any City fan come to think of it) would not want to see the likes of Ronaldo playing week in week out, would quite frankly baffle me.
The real question would probably be though "Would he come?".
Ok the fee's a bit excessive but all valuations when City are involved get inflated, i'm sure this £150m valuation would end up being nearer £100m. Re-coup £50m+ from the sale of Tevez (as he's going) along with a couple of other nearly men, bingo.....you've got you're fee back. Stick him on more or less the same wages as Tevez and realistically City haven't changed a lot financially.
This must be what 'Arry meant about Citys signings that'll blow your mind.
shakencity- Cult Hero
- Posts : 8739
Age : 53
Location : Bury
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
The club have already said that there's no truth in these statements which is a polite way of saying the reports are a load of bollocks. Great player but a total piece of shit and not fit to put on the sky blue shirt.
Norfolk Blue- New Signing
- Posts : 77
Age : 80
Location : West Norfolk
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
There is no doubting that he is a great player but he would be more trouble than he is worth. Bobby doesn't like prima donna players & if he can fall out with Mourinho how is he going to fair against Bobby. No chance
The slimeball has always said if he were to come back he'd go to the rag shit anyway - not that they could afford him now anyway
The slimeball has always said if he were to come back he'd go to the rag shit anyway - not that they could afford him now anyway
TMG- Key Player
- Posts : 3794
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
No thanks, wouldn't want the Transtesticle playing in a blue shirt - not him, please no God not him (or Shrek)
Wensdi- Key Player
- Posts : 3273
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
I say buy him, castrate him and let him work in the harem..... well it works for me.
lee1pen- Regular Starter
- Posts : 1228
Age : 73
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
I'd much rather have Iniesta, Xavi or Messi than Christine Ronaldo any bloody day.
Yaya_Nono- Youth Team
- Posts : 185
Age : 53
Location : Cork, Ireland.
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
Wensdi, as good a footballer as he is, i would hate to see him in a blue shirt, not even whinging rags would change my mind, i can't stand the bloke.
BoyWithTheArabsCash- Regular Starter
- Posts : 1132
Location : Giggidy.
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
Aye he's a cunt all right
Paulpowersleftfoot- Key Player
- Posts : 3674
Location : Leafy cheshire
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
Does anyone else remember the derby at Eastlands a couple of years back when he started on the ball boy cos he threw the ball at him when it went out for a corner/throw? Lad is a bellend 100%.
gratedbean- Bench Warmer
- Posts : 720
Age : 33
Location : Manchester/Sheffield
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
Diving cheating twat makes nani look like zabaleta
What a pity ratboy didn't consider playing city in his testimonial,I think we would have given him a fitting send off
What a pity ratboy didn't consider playing city in his testimonial,I think we would have given him a fitting send off
Paulpowersleftfoot- Key Player
- Posts : 3674
Location : Leafy cheshire
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
Guess it's just me that'd have him then lads n lasses
shakencity- Cult Hero
- Posts : 8739
Age : 53
Location : Bury
Re: Ronaldo (Not the fat one)
You'll have to catch me 1st, although admittedly my fastest days are well behind me .
shakencity- Cult Hero
- Posts : 8739
Age : 53
Location : Bury
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Today at 4:13 pm by atlblue
» Pep’s at it again
Fri Apr 19, 2024 7:39 pm by Topdawg
» Nijinsky tips
Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:08 pm by Nijinsky
» I can't believe it
Mon Feb 05, 2024 11:11 pm by titbumwilly
» Today's game
Sun Jan 14, 2024 11:04 am by skyblueoz
» Happy christmas Blue Moon Users & Guests
Mon Dec 25, 2023 8:30 am by shakencity
» Bloody Rubbish
Sun Dec 24, 2023 4:08 pm by skyblueoz
» World Cup Final
Mon Oct 30, 2023 11:21 am by shakencity
» The Man City Academy - What' the point?
Fri Sep 22, 2023 4:02 pm by lee1pen
» Transfer business - good or bad?
Fri Sep 08, 2023 3:44 pm by Nijinsky