Who would you rather have Alexis Sanchez or David Villa

There is talk in the papers that David Villa will be offered to Chelsea and City for about £40M to fund the purchase of Alexis Sanchez.

The question is who would you rather have, Sanchez or Villa?

I'd rather we got Sanchez (especially if Tevez stays) because our 'reserve' firepower of Dzeko and Balotelli is reasonable enough.

I wouldn't want to buy David Villa to help Barca fund the purchase of Sanchez.

There could be the risk that Chelsea will buy Villa thus allowing Barca to complete on Sanchez and we'd get nothing.

Sanchez would be a much better addition to the squad than villa,especially if Carlos stays

I'm not sure. Villa knows how Silva plays and vice versa. I'd love Villa at City but I know we need a winger more.

Depends on Tevez does'nt it, If the ragtops are to be believed we are offering Tevez a bizzare free transfer if he stays for 2 years?

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/football/view/196736/CITY-S-FREE-FOR-2-TEVEZ-DEAL/

Part-ex Balotelli for Sanchez and buy Villa, that would be my dream Summer.

... Or part ex Jo for Sanchez and buy Villa, but now we really are dreaming...

Villa is 30, and they want £40mill? get real.... while Barca are saying they'll go higher than £35mill for Fabregas who is 25?
I too think Sanchez is the better option if Tevez stays, glad I'm not the one making all the big decesions!!!

Telegraph seem to thing a deals done with barca.

Said it before, id prefer if we got sneijder, proven in three leagues, more versatile imo a better player, we just cannot let the rags get him also.

Ps villa?! No thanks, 10m yes due to his age...

I wasn't aware of the price tag. £40M is daft for Villa at his age. If we could get him cheaper, it could be good with his understanding with Silva.